Questions for the OG0-093 were updated on : Dec 03 ,2025
You are working as an Enterprise Architect at a technology company. The company has multiple
subsidiary companies, engaged in mobile, online shopping, cloud computing services, and a social
media platform. The company has grown rapidly and claims to be adding 20 million new users a
month.
The company has an established Enterprise Architecture (EA) program based on the TOGAF standard,
sponsored jointly by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Information Officer (CIO). In your
role as an Enterprise Architect within the EA team, you work closely with the business stakeholders
in the company as well as the sponsors.
The senior leadership within the company is worried about the ability of the company to address the
challenges of climate change and the opportunities around artificial intelligence. They are concerned
that the business will not be sustainable without making significant changes. Most senior leaders feel
that the operations must become more efficient, and the organization needs to change in order to
achieve its future goals.
The CEO has decided that reorganizing its subsidiaries around artificial intelligence and machine
learning will improve the way the company creates and delivers value. The sponsors have approved
an EA project for the reorganization. The EA team has created a strategic architecture with the CEO
and CIO. It includes an Architecture Vision and high-level definitions of the domain architectures.
This sets out an ambitious plan over a three-year period and covers three distinct transformations to
implement the reorganization.
The sponsors have read reports that up to 70% of companies are failing at digital and artificial
intelligence transformation. They have made it clear that prior to the approval of the detailed
Implementation and Migration Plan, the EA team needs to assess and mitigate the risks associated
with the reorganization. They want assurance that the reorganization will succeed and deliver the
promised increases in value for the business.
You have been asked by the EA team leader to recommend the approach to address the request from
the sponsors.
A
Explanation:
Option A aligns with TOGAF’s focus on change readiness assessment and risk mitigation in
transformations. Identifying dependencies, gaps, and risks, and addressing them in the
Implementation and Migration Plan, aligns with the ADM’s Phases E and F.
Options B, C, and D introduce unnecessary complexity, focusing on specific techniques or analysis
methods that do not comprehensively address the sponsors’ concerns about transformation
readiness.
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a
technology company. The company provides staff, as well as cloud-based services for many
government agencies.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise
Architecture (EA) practice. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the sponsor of the activity. The
practice uses an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision-
makers to gain valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems
are the company’s major asset and are highly confidential. The company employees work remotely
and need constant access to the company systems, which is done by the public infrastructure. They
use message encryption, secure internet connections using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and
other standard security measures. The company has provided computer security awareness training
for all its staff.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks
on companies with a similar profile. The CSO understands that even with thorough preparation, a
major attack could stop employees from being able to do their jobs. This could lead to a large
financial loss, damage to the company’s reputation with customers, and employees being unable to
work.
A risk assessment has been completed, and the company has looked for cyber insurance that covers
such attacks. The price for this insurance is very high. The CTO has decided not to get cyber insurance
to cover such attacks.
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to strengthen the current architecture to
improve data protection.
A
Explanation:
Option A aligns with TOGAF’s approach to risk management and iteration within the ADM. It
emphasizes proactive monitoring, gap analysis, and disaster recovery exercises, which are essential
in addressing the identified risks. Updating the Architecture Repository ensures proper
documentation and alignment with the architecture lifecycle.
Option B focuses on compliance rather than actively addressing identified risks.
Option C prematurely limits the scope to the infrastructure level, neglecting broader security and
resilience measures.
Option D delays action by initiating a new ADM cycle without leveraging immediate mitigation
strategies.
You are working as an Enterprise Architect. The company you work for creates and sells products
targeted at the end-user market, which are sold through retail organizations worldwide.
The company is embarking on a Digital Transformation where it will expand its offerings from
physical products to also include digital products and digital services. This includes enabling each of
its product lines to offer digital products or services associated with their existing physical products.
The feedback from customers is that they do not find much value in these direct-to-consumer digital
products. Analysis of the data on how the products are being used and who is using them shows that
the products are not reaching the target audience that they were designed for, leading to a failure to
meet the revenue goals. The product manager is seeking advice on how to tackle these problems,
while making sure that the products still comply within the guardrails set by the EA team.
You are part of the Enterprise Architecture Team. The company uses Agile product management
techniques and Agile development practices. The EA team works with the product management
teams, supporting and enabling the Agile development teams.
You are working with the EA Team Leader to develop a plan for the overall Digital Transformation
project. You have been asked to work on a specific product line, which is experimenting with new
direct-to-consumer digital products using a third-party platform. The product development for this
experiment took a Minimum Viable Architecture approach, including a shallow architecture
development iteration with a focus on the Application Architecture, followed by a quick and minimal
implementation.
The Enterprise Architecture practice at the company is sponsored by the Chief Technology Officer.
The EA team has operated successfully for several years and has well-developed processes based on
the TOGAF standard. The EA team’s responsibilities include architecting product development
processes and customer experience.
The EA team leader wants to know how to gather information in order to respond to the product
manager.
A
Explanation:
Option A correctly addresses the issue by focusing on understanding customer value through
Business Architecture modeling and value stream mapping. These approaches, supported by
TOGAF’s ADM Phase B, help ensure that the architecture aligns with customer needs and improves
revenue generation.
Options B, C, and D either neglect customer-focused modeling or emphasize unnecessary phases like
complete ADM cycles, which would delay actionable insights for the product manager.
You are an Enterprise Architect working within a multinational company. The company has been very
successful and has been buying companies around the world. It has led to a growing number of
manufacturing divisions in various locations with a complex supply chain.
The top management recently expressed concerns about the company's effectiveness because of its
multiple data centers and duplicate applications. The EA team has been working on a project to solve
this issue. An analysis shows that supply chain issues have led to not enough products being
produced to meet all the customer demand.
A strategic architecture has been defined to help meet customer demand and manage the supply
chain more effectively. The strategic architecture involves combining different Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) applications that are currently used separately in the company's production sites.
Each division has finished the Architecture Definition documentation to address their own specific
manufacturing needs. The enterprise architects have defined a set of work packages that address the
gaps found. They have noted the value produced, work needed, and dependencies between work
packages to achieve a target architecture for adding a new ERP environment into the company.
Because of the risks posed by this change from the current environment, the architects have
recommended that a phased approach should be taken to implement the target architecture with
several stages of change. The entire implementation process is estimated to take over two years.
The company has an established Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and follows the TOGAF
Architecture Development Method. The company also uses various management frameworks such
as business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The EA program
is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO). In your role as an Enterprise Architect within the
EA team, you work closely with the important stakeholders from the various divisions within the
company.
You have been asked about the next steps in planning the migration.
B
Explanation:
Option B aligns with TOGAF’s ADM Phase F (Migration Planning). Using the Business Value
Assessment Technique, prioritizing work packages, and confirming Transition Architectures ensures
an effective and phased approach to mitigate risks and achieve desired business outcomes. TOGAF
emphasizes creating a table of Architecture Definition Increments to guide this process.
Option A neglects the detailed planning and prioritization necessary for phased implementation.
Option C focuses prematurely on compliance without first ensuring a structured migration plan.
Option D emphasizes alignment but lacks the prioritization and ROI evaluation required for Transition
Architectures.
You are an Enterprise Architect at a food production and distribution company. The primary goal of
the company is to maximize profit while satisfying the needs of consumers for its products. Its
customers are demanding food that is produced sustainably, safely, and transparently while reducing
environmental impact.
The business is highly mechanized, and this mechanization has caused a decrease in the number of
workers needed, together with a focus on agricultural engineering to improve the efficiency of its
farms, its processing facilities, and the overall enterprise. As part of this, the company has
established an Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice based on the TOGAF standard, using it as the
method and guiding framework. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of EA practice.
The introduction of EA has enabled the decision-makers to have valuable insights into the different
aspects of the business.
Global warming has caused a lot of poor harvests, and the company is producing fewer crops than
before. This combined with an increase in costs for energy, feed, fuel, and fertilizer has led to a
significant decrease in profits. The rising costs and reduced profits mean that the company is unable
to take as much planned action on climate measures as it would like, such as reducing its carbon
footprint. In response to the situation, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has decided that big changes
are needed that will lead both to improved crop production and profitability. They must look to all
aspects of the business. This includes looking at the mix of crops to mitigate for the change in
climate.
The company will also cease to process its own crops and will sell off its processing facilities. Thus,
the target market will change, and the end-products will be different and more varied. A formal
request for architecture change has been approved. At this stage, there is no fixed scope, shared
vision, or objectives.
Refer to the scenario:
You have been asked to propose the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's
change in direction for the company.
D
Explanation:
Option D aligns with TOGAF’s ADM, emphasizing the need to define and analyze the business
strategy and parameters as part of Phase B (Business Architecture). This ensures that the architecture
supports the new direction by addressing the core issues and defining a clear scope before
proceeding to other phases.
Options A, B, and C either focus prematurely on Technology Architecture or omit the importance of
creating a clear business strategy foundation before other phases.
You are working as an Enterprise Architect at a large company. The company runs many retail stores,
as well as an online marketplace. The online marketplace allows hundreds of brands to partner with
the company.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and uses the TOGAF standard for its
architecture development method. The EA practice is involved in all aspects of the business, with
oversight provided by an Architecture Board with representatives from different parts of the
business. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO).
Many of the stores remain open all day and night. Each store uses a standard method to track sales
and inventory. This involves sending accurate, timely sales data to a central AI-based inventory
management system that can predict demand, adjust stock levels, and automate reordering. The
central inventory management system is housed at the company's central data center.
The company has bought a major rival. The Chief Executive Officer believes that a merger will enable
growth through combined offerings and cost savings. The decision has been taken to fully integrate
the two organizations, including merging retail operations and systems. This means that duplicated
systems will be replaced with one standard retail management system. Also, the company will
reduce the number of applications that are used. The CIO expects significant savings will be achieved
by implementing these changes across the newly merged company.
One improvement that the rival has successfully implemented is the use of hand-held devices within
stores, for both customers and staff. This has increased both customer and staff employee
satisfaction due to the time savings this has brought. The CIO has given the go-ahead to roll out the
devices in all stores but has stated that training on how to use the hand-held devices should be brief
because there are a lot of employees, many of whom are part-time.
The Request for Architecture Work to oversee the merger has been approved. The project has been
scoped and you have been assigned to work on it. Your role includes managing the architecture for
the retail stores.
Refer to the scenario:
You have been asked to confirm the most relevant architecture principles for the transformation.
A
Explanation:
Option A reflects TOGAF’s recommended architecture principles that best align with the goals of this
scenario:
Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise: Ensures enterprise-wide focus during the transformation.
Common Use Applications: Aligns with reducing duplicated systems across merged entities.
Data is an Asset: Highlights the central role of data in AI-based inventory and retail operations.
Responsive Change Management: Accommodates the quick rollout of handheld devices with brief
training.
Technology Independence: Ensures flexibility in adopting new systems and devices.
Options B, C, and D focus on principles like Compliance with the Law, Data Security, and Control
Technical Diversity, which are important but less relevant as primary drivers for this transformation.
You are an Enterprise Architect working at a vehicle manufacturing company. The company
specializes in buses and coaches. You are part of an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team that has
responsibilities across multiple divisions of the company.
The company has a corporate strategy that focuses on switching to electric power for its vehicles. It
has invested heavily in a new standardized design, production efforts, and major components to use
across all its product range. The company has multiple manufacturing plants in North America,
Europe, and Asia.
Customer demand has caused a backlog of orders because many customers want to have more
environmentally friendly public transportation. There are not enough electronic components
available, which is making it hard to produce products and meet customer demand. To address this
issue, the company has started making the battery packs themselves and has hired new suppliers.
The company has a well-established EA practice. It uses the TOGAF Standard as the foundation for its
work, including the internal EA framework. Additionally, the company uses various management
frameworks such as business planning, project management, and operations management. The
Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Chief Operating Officer (COO) jointly sponsor the Enterprise
Architecture program.
The EA team is working on a project to improve the process and systems to design, produce, and test
the battery pack. As part of putting the new battery pack into production, changes to the assembly
processes need to be made. A trial has been completed at a single location. The Chief Engineer,
sponsor of the activity, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan to roll out these changes
to all plants.
Preliminary Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to put in place
the new processes for each location. The company mixes internal teams with a few third-party
contractors at the locations. The Chief Engineer is worried that the deployment will not be consistent
and of satisfactory quality.
Refer to the scenario:
The EA team leader has asked you to review the preliminary Architecture Contracts and recommend
the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.
A
Explanation:
Option A aligns with TOGAF’s approach to Architecture Contracts as defined in the TOGAF ADM
Phase G (Implementation Governance). It focuses on ensuring that contracts are comprehensive,
enforceable, and include mechanisms for compliance reviews and governance. The recommendation
to have compliance reviews and dispensation for deviations aligns with TOGAF's governance
framework, which allows for flexibility while ensuring alignment with the architecture's objectives.
Options B, C, and D deviate from the structured governance model recommended by TOGAF. They
either lack clarity in governance processes or do not emphasize the importance of enforceability and
compliance mechanisms at key milestones.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is consultant to the Lead Architect within a multinational company. The
company is organized into independent operational divisions on a national basis. The
company adapts its marketing messaging to fit each culture group, with the adaptation
of product offerings and manufacturing processes in each market.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and uses the
TOGAF standard as the basis of its architecture framework. In addition to the EA
program, the company has several management frameworks in use, including
business planning, portfolio/project management, and operations management. The
EA program is sponsored by the CIO.
A strategic architecture has been approved that includes consolidation of multiple
applications that have been operating in the production facilities across the divisions.
The goal is to replace the functionality of the existing applications with a new
application running as a single instance in the company's primary data center.
Each division has completed the Architecture Definition documentation required to
integrate the new application to meet its own specific manufacturing requirements.
The key corporate change attributes and implementation constraints have been
confirmed. A consolidated gap analysis has been completed which has identified the
gaps across the Business, Data, Application, and Technology domains. Using the gap
analysis results, a review of the consolidated requirements, dependencies, and
interoperability requirements needed to integrate the new application has been
completed. The Business Transformation Readiness Assessment started in Phase A
has been completed. A risk assessment has been completed.
The implementation process is estimated to take four years. Because of the risks
posed by the complexity of the current environment, a phased approach is needed to
implement the target architectures. The Implementation and Migration Plan v0.1, the
draft Architecture Roadmap, and the Capability Assessment deliverables are now
complete.
Refer to the Scenario
You have been asked to recommend the next steps to prepare the final
Implementation and Migration Plan.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
A
Explanation:
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
In this scenario, the company has completed significant groundwork for its Implementation and
Migration Planning. A consolidated gap analysis, risk assessment, and Business Transformation
Readiness Assessment have all been completed, and initial deliverables, such as the draft
Implementation and Migration Plan v0.1, the Architecture Roadmap, and the Capability Assessment,
are in place. The project will follow a phased implementation over four years due to the complexity
and risks involved.
TOGAF’s Phase F (Migration Planning) requires prioritizing projects, aligning resources, and ensuring
coordination with existing management frameworks. Key next steps include finalizing the
Implementation and Migration Plan by refining work packages, assigning business values, aligning
with organizational frameworks, and coordinating resources.
Explanation of Option A and Why It is the Best Answer
Option A is the best approach for the following reasons:
Assessing Impact on Other Frameworks:
TOGAF recommends evaluating how the Implementation and Migration Plan interacts with other
organizational frameworks such as portfolio/project management, operations, and business planning
frameworks. This ensures alignment and avoids conflicts, a critical step in a large organization with
established management frameworks (TOGAF Phase F, Section 14.4).
Coordinating with these frameworks allows for smoother integration across departments, which is
essential in this multinational and multi-divisional context.
Assigning Business Value to Work Packages:
Assigning business value to each work package enables prioritization based on return on investment
(ROI), stakeholder priorities, and alignment with corporate goals. This aligns with TOGAF’s
recommendation to use business value as a prioritization metric for work packages, helping to guide
resource allocation (TOGAF Section 14.4.1).
Business value-driven prioritization is especially relevant given the four-year implementation
timeline and complex, phased approach.
Resource and Project Prioritization:
Identifying and prioritizing projects within the plan while considering available resources and
dependencies helps ensure that the phased implementation aligns with both strategic priorities and
resource constraints. TOGAF emphasizes that careful project sequencing and resource planning are
vital to ensure the feasible and effective execution of the target architecture (TOGAF Section 14.4.2).
Finalizing the Implementation and Migration Plan:
Gathering the remaining details for the final Implementation and Migration Plan ensures all
necessary data, including prioritizations, resources, and dependencies, are documented, as
recommended in TOGAF’s ADM Phase F. This results in a fully refined, actionable plan aligned with
organizational goals and capabilities.
Why Options B, C, and D Are Less Suitable
Option B: While reviewing migration outputs and identifying priorities and resources is important,
this option’s focus on solution development requirements and monitoring tools is premature and
more relevant to implementation phases, rather than finalizing a migration plan. TOGAF Phase F
emphasizes creating a comprehensive plan rather than focusing immediately on development and
performance monitoring.
Option C: This option suggests using business value to prioritize projects and confirm transition
phases with an Architecture Definition Increments Table, which is useful. However, it focuses on
performance evaluation criteria and lessons learned, which are more pertinent to monitoring
implementation progress rather than finalizing the plan. TOGAF’s guidance at this stage focuses on
finalizing details and aligning the plan with organizational frameworks.
Option D: While configuration control of architecture documents is valuable, it is generally an
ongoing activity within architecture governance rather than a step in finalizing the Implementation
and Migration Plan. The recommendation to use an Implementation Governance Model and capture
lessons learned is useful for long-term governance but is not directly relevant to finalizing the
Implementation and Migration Plan itself.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option A
TOGAF Section 14.4 (Phase F: Migration Planning): Highlights the importance of assessing the
Implementation and Migration Plan’s impact on other frameworks, such as portfolio and project
management, to ensure coordinated execution.
TOGAF Section 14.4.1 (Prioritization of Work Packages): Recommends prioritizing work packages
based on business value to support stakeholder needs and organizational objectives.
TOGAF Section 14.4.2 (Resource Planning and Coordination): Stresses that careful resource planning
and project sequencing are essential for phased implementations in complex environments.
In conclusion, Option A is the best answer, as it aligns with TOGAF’s guidance to assess the plan’s
impact on other frameworks, prioritize work packages by business value, and gather remaining
details to generate a comprehensive final Implementation and Migration Plan. This approach ensures
a coordinated and strategically aligned rollout across the organization.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is an Enterprise Architect for a chain of convenience stores. Many of the stores
remain open 24 hours a day. Each store has a standardized retail solution using cloud-
based point-of-sale (POS) technology to manage sales and inventory. The cloud-based
systems collect real-time data to support ordering and product selection decisions
including the tailoring of product assortment based on sales history, customer
demographics as well as the short-term weather forecast.
The company has acquired a smaller competitor, that has similar product lines and
operates in a different geographic region. The CEO believes that a merger will enable
growth through combined offerings and cost savings. This growth includes market share,
geographic expansion, as well as product diversification. The decision has been taken to
quickly integrate the two organizations, including merging retail operations and systems.
The merger will replace duplicated systems with the standardized cloud-based point-of-
sale technology. One innovation that the competitor has deployed is the use of hand-
held tablets within stores, together with a suite of store management applications, and
this is to be adopted across the whole of the merged organization. It has been observed
that this has increased employee satisfaction due to the time savings this has brought
compared to the previous fixed screens used for data entry.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice based on the TOGAF
Standard, with the CEO and CIO as joint sponsors. A project is underway to manage the
merger of the operations and systems.
The CIO anticipates significant cost savings will be made by moving to the standardized
retail solution across the merged organization. The CIO has also stated that the staff
training for the hand-held tablets should be kept to a minimum due to the large number
of employees, which include a large proportion of part-time employees.
Refer to the Scenario
[Note: You should assume that the company has adopted the example set of principles
that are listed and defined in the TOGAF standard, Architecture Principles chapter. You
may need to refer to the Architecture Principles chapter, section 20.6 (located in Part III)
within the reference text in order to answer this question.]
You have been asked to identify the most relevant architecture principles for the current
situation.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best answer?
[Note: The ordering of the principles listed in each answer is not significant.]
C
Explanation:
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
In this scenario, an established convenience store chain has acquired a smaller competitor, and the
goal is to merge operations and systems quickly. This includes consolidating the two companies'
retail systems by adopting the standardized cloud-based point-of-sale (POS) system. The merger also
involves deploying hand-held tablets (a system currently used by the acquired company), which has
been noted for improving employee satisfaction and efficiency. The CIO aims to achieve cost savings
and minimize training requirements, given the large number of employees, many of whom are part-
time.
To address these goals and the rapid integration requirements, selecting relevant architecture
principles that support ease of use, system integration, shared data access, and continuity is
essential. These principles must align with TOGAF's guidelines for developing architecture that
balances organizational benefits with operational efficiency.
Explanation of Option C and Why It is the Best Answer
Option C offers the most relevant principles based on TOGAF’s example principles for the current
business needs in this scenario:
Common Use Applications:
This principle promotes standardization across the organization, ensuring that applications are used
in a way that meets the needs of both the existing chain and the acquired stores. It aligns with the
CIO’s objective of cost savings by reducing duplicated systems and supporting the adoption of a
common POS system across the merged entity.
TOGAF Section 20.6 highlights this principle as a way to maximize resource efficiency and provide a
unified experience across divisions, which is crucial for successful integration.
Data is Shared:
The principle of shared data ensures that information can flow seamlessly across both organizations,
supporting real-time decision-making for product selection and ordering based on sales history,
demographics, and forecasts.
According to TOGAF, sharing data is essential in organizations aiming for consolidated and
synchronized systems, as it improves operational efficiency and informed decision-making.
Data is Accessible:
Accessibility of data enables both the existing and acquired stores to retrieve the information they
need for daily operations, including inventory management and sales analytics. With accessible data,
stores can leverage insights from the new system and handheld devices effectively.
TOGAF emphasizes that accessible data helps improve decision-making speed, which is critical in a
retail environment with real-time requirements.
Ease of Use:
Given the CIO’s concern about minimizing training for a large, part-time workforce, ease of use is
crucial. This principle ensures that the adopted technology is intuitive and requires minimal training,
supporting quick adoption by employees and maximizing productivity gains from the new hand-held
tablets.
TOGAF suggests that user-friendly systems reduce the burden on training resources and improve
employee satisfaction, which aligns with the observed benefits of the handheld device adoption in
the acquired company.
Business Continuity:
Business continuity ensures that the retail operations of the convenience store chain, which operates
24/7, are resilient to disruptions. This principle supports a robust architecture that can handle system
changes and ensure ongoing operations, essential for customer service and revenue.
TOGAF’s focus on business continuity highlights its importance in maintaining uninterrupted service,
a critical factor for a 24/7 retail chain undergoing significant integration.
Why Options A, B, and D Are Less Suitable
Option A: While principles like "Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise" and "Responsive Change
Management" are beneficial, this option lacks principles directly addressing ease of use, data
accessibility, and common applications, which are critical to achieve a smooth and efficient merger in
this retail scenario.
Option B: This option includes "Compliance with the Law" and "Common Vocabulary and Data
Definitions," which, although useful, do not directly address the operational and usability goals
necessary for a rapid integration. Additionally, "Requirements Based Change" does not align as
directly with the goal of standardizing applications and ensuring ease of use.
Option D: While principles like "Interoperability" and "Control Technical Diversity" are relevant for
maintaining compatibility, this option lacks "Ease of Use" and "Business Continuity," both of which
are critical given the operational demands of 24/7 stores and the need for minimal employee
training.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option C
TOGAF Section 20.6 (Architecture Principles): Emphasizes the value of principles such as Common
Use Applications for standardization, Ease of Use for reducing complexity, and Data Accessibility for
operational effectiveness. These principles are especially pertinent for organizations merging
systems and aiming to maximize usability and interoperability.
TOGAF ADM Guidelines: Encourage selecting principles that support efficient integration and rapid
adoption of new systems, especially in scenarios requiring cross-organizational alignment.
In conclusion, Option C is the best answer as it includes the most relevant principles—Common Use
Applications, Data is Shared, Data is Accessible, Ease of Use, and Business Continuity—that align with
the business and operational needs of the merging convenience store chains, as per TOGAF guidance
on architecture principles.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of Enterprise Architect for a chain of convenience stores. The chain
includes over five thousand retail outlets. Each store in the chain is an independently
owned and operated franchise. The stores operate 24 hours a day and 7 days a week.
Many of the stores have been with the franchise for more than 10 years and still use the
original IT systems deployed at that time.
The chain has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice based in its headquarters and
uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework.
The CEO of the chain has stated concerns about the inefficiencies of the current
systems and identified the need to change. He has defined a strategic vision that will
enhance the business by providing its franchisees new services to help them compete
with other retail outlets and online retailers. This strategy is part of the long-term
commitment to enhance the brand image and increase revenue for the chain.
The Chief Architect engaged the services of a leading consulting firm that specializes in
business strategy. An initial study has been conducted to identify the strategic changes
needed to implement the CEO's vision. This recently completed with approval of a
strategic architecture encompassing the entire chain, including detailed requirements
and recommendations. Based on the recommendations from the study, the decision has
been made for the chain to adopt a packaged suite of integrated applications that is
tailored to the needs of the franchise.
The changes will help provide the chain with improved products, and more efficient
operations. The stores will also act as delivery and return locations for a large online
retailer which will further increase the number of potential customers. The addition of a
corporate-wide data warehouse will provide analytics that will enable the marketing
group to improve its ability to target advertising and new products to specific regions.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked by the Chief Architect to propose the best approach for
architecture development to realize the CEO's vision.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
C
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are serving as the Lead Enterprise Architect for a life insurance, annuities, and
pensions company, which has been formed through the merger of three companies.
The company consists of three divisions with the same names and division
headquarters as their predecessors.
The lack of integration between the three divisions has increasingly caused problems
in the handling of customer and financial information. At present, each division
maintains its own applications. Despite an earlier initiative to install a common
application to manage customer, products, and claims information, each division has
different ways of defining its data elements and has customized the common
application to the point where the ability to exchange information is error-prone.
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) has formed an Enterprise Architecture
department, and one of the primary goals in its charter is to coordinate efforts
between the teams in each division. The CIO has also formed a cross-functional
Architecture Board to oversee and perform governance. The TOGAF standard is used
as the basis for the core framework of the Enterprise Architecture program. The
company has an existing team of security architects.
The company has made the decision to introduce a common web portal, contact
center software suite, and document management system. Also the company has
selected a single enterprise-wide customer relationship management (CRM)
application to consolidate information from several applications that exist across the
divisions. The application will be used by each of the divisions and accessed by third
party partners through well-defined interfaces.
The CIO is concerned that the new application must be able to manage and
safeguard customer information in a secure manner that meets or exceeds the legal
requirements of the countries in which the company operates. This will be an
increasingly important capability as the company expands its online services in
cooperation with its external partners.
Refer to the Scenario
As part of the process for initiating the Enterprise Architecture project to rollout the
new application, you are developing a set of architecture principles.
You need to recommend the best approach for this work.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
C
Explanation:
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
In this scenario, a recently formed insurance company is experiencing challenges with integration
between its three divisions. The lack of a cohesive data structure across divisions has led to
inefficiencies and errors. The CIO has formed an Enterprise Architecture department with a charter
to coordinate cross-division efforts, establish governance, and develop a secure and legally
compliant customer information management system that integrates with various applications. This
initiative is critical as the company expands its online services and collaborates with external
partners.
A set of architecture principles is needed to ensure that the architecture aligns with the business’s
goals, addresses regulatory requirements, and promotes standardization across divisions.
Explanation of Option C and Why It Is the Best Answer
Option C aligns closely with TOGAF’s recommended approach for developing and validating
architecture principles, particularly in complex environments with multiple stakeholders, such as this
merged company. Here’s why:
Review of Mission Statements, Goals, and Business Drivers:
Analyzing the mission statements, business goals, and business drivers for the company and its
divisions is essential. This step ensures that the principles reflect the strategic direction of the
organization and align with the business needs. TOGAF emphasizes that architecture principles
should be developed in a way that promotes IT alignment with business strategy (refer to TOGAF Part
II, Chapter 20: Architecture Principles).
Engagement with Key Stakeholders and Architecture Board:
Working closely with key stakeholders and the Architecture Board is critical to ensure that the
principles are relevant and widely accepted. Engaging these stakeholders promotes alignment and
support for the architecture principles, which is essential in a cross-functional environment. TOGAF
highlights the importance of engaging stakeholders in the principles development process to gain
their commitment and ensure that the principles are practical and actionable.
Review Meetings with Senior Management:
Review meetings with stakeholders, including senior management, ensure that the architecture
principles are understood, endorsed, and supported at all levels of the organization. This step
addresses the need for broad acceptance and alignment across divisions, as outlined in TOGAF
guidance, which stresses that principles should be approved by senior management to enforce
adherence and drive compliance within the organization.
Alignment with TOGAF ADM Guidelines:
TOGAF’s Phase A (Architecture Vision) includes defining architecture principles that guide the
architecture’s development and governance. Ensuring these principles promote IT-business
alignment is a core part of TOGAF’s approach to Enterprise Architecture, particularly in organizations
with complex business structures or multiple divisions.
Why Options A, B, and D Are Less Suitable
Option A: Defining principles based only on the EA department charter, without broader stakeholder
input, would likely result in limited buy-in across divisions. Although compliance assessments are
valuable, they alone do not ensure alignment with business strategies, which is critical in this
scenario.
Option B: While this option suggests analyzing the mission statements and corporate goals, it does
not involve collaboration with key stakeholders and the Architecture Board, which TOGAF
recommends for gaining alignment and support. Additionally, seeking endorsement only from the
CIO, rather than engaging a broader group of stakeholders and senior management, limits the
likelihood of acceptance and adherence across the organization.
Option D: Relying on industry best practices and trends alone would not address the specific strategic
goals and business drivers of the company. TOGAF emphasizes that architecture principles should be
tailored to the organization’s unique needs and business strategies rather than relying solely on
external standards or trends.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option C
TOGAF Part II, Chapter 20 (Architecture Principles): Recommends developing principles based on the
organization’s mission, goals, and strategic drivers to ensure alignment between IT and business
objectives.
TOGAF Part I, Chapter 7 (ADM Phase A: Architecture Vision): Emphasizes the importance of defining
architecture principles and securing buy-in from stakeholders to guide architecture development and
governance.
TOGAF Part II, Section 20.4 (Developing Architecture Principles): Highlights the need for principles to
be endorsed by senior management and relevant stakeholders, which is necessary to ensure that
they are actionable, enforceable, and aligned with business strategy.
In conclusion, Option C is the best answer as it aligns with TOGAF’s guidance on engaging
stakeholders, defining principles based on the organization’s strategic direction, and securing broad
acceptance to ensure successful alignment of IT with the business’s goals across all divisions.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect in a multinational automotive and clean
energy company. The company designs and manufactures electric vehicles, battery
storage, and solar panels. The company has multiple manufacturing facilities, in North
America, Europe, and in Asi
a. Most of the facilities are wholly owned by the company,
but two in Asia are jointly owned with local partners.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice that is supported by a
cross-functional Architecture Board. The TOGAF standard is used for developing the
automated manufacturing process and systems used to design, manufacture and test
the new design. The Chief Information Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-
sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.
A challenge that the company is facing is to scale up the number of vehicles coming
off the production lines to meet customer demand. At the moment there are supply
chain shortages for key custom-designed electronic components used in the vehicles.
In response to this, the research arm of the company has pioneered the development
of a revised design using common off-the-shelf components that will allow for a
significant increase in overall vehicle production. This new design is ready to go into
production.
As part of putting the new design into production, adjustments to the automated
assembly processes need to be made. A pilot architecture project at a single location
has defined an updated approach for controlling the automated systems used to
perform final assembly and quality assurance. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the
activity, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan for immediate
implementation at each plant.
Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement
and deploy the new automated system controller for each location. The Chief
Engineer has expressed concern that a uniform process be employed at each location
to ensure consistency and quality.
Refer to the Scenario
You have been asked to recommend the best approach to address the Chief
Engineer's concern.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
B
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are serving as the Lead Architect for an Enterprise Architecture project team
within a multinational energy company. The company is organized into two major
business operations:
· Upstream operations which include exploration for crude oil and natural gas and
operating the infrastructure necessary to deliver oil and gas to the market
· Downstream operations which include the manufacturing, distribution and marketing
activities for oil products and chemicals
The downstream business includes oil refining, a retail filling station network,
lubricants manufacture and marketing, industrial fuel and lubricants sales. The
practice for the downstream business has been to operate locally, managed by local
"operating companies".
There is an established Enterprise Architecture program within the company, and the
TOGAF standard has been adopted as the framework.
Safety is a priority for the company, with the aim to ensure it causes zero harm to
people and the environment. The company has to satisfy the regulatory requirements
of each of the countries it operates in.
The Governing Board is concerned about the risk posed by operating in this complex
global environment with a large part of the downstream business represented by local
operating companies.
The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has requested to be informed about the status of
downstream operations that could impact regulatory compliance. He also wants the
corporate legal staff and auditors to analyze all proposed new downstream operations
to ensure that they are within the legal guidelines for each country. In addition, the
local operating companies should be able to see that the architecture is appropriate
for their needs.
The architecture project team has completed a detailed Request for Architecture Work
providing the high level project description. As the project commences the next phase,
the necessary approvals from management have been received.
Refer to the Scenario
You have been asked to recommend an approach that would enable the development
of an architecture that addresses the needs of the Chief Compliance Officer, legal
staff, auditors and the local operating companies.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
C
Explanation:
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
In this scenario, you are leading an architecture project for a multinational energy company with
both upstream and downstream operations. The downstream operations, in particular, are complex
due to local regulations in each country where the company operates. The CEO is especially
concerned with ensuring regulatory compliance, with the legal and auditing teams tasked with
analyzing new downstream operations to ensure adherence to each country’s legal requirements.
Additionally, local operating companies should find the architecture appropriate for their needs.
The TOGAF framework recommends identifying and addressing stakeholder concerns early in the
ADM process, especially during the Architecture Vision phase (Phase A). Stakeholder analysis is a
foundational activity in TOGAF to ensure that diverse concerns are addressed systematically and that
all necessary perspectives are considered. This approach helps in aligning the architecture work with
organizational needs and in facilitating communication with various stakeholder groups.
Explanation of Option C and Why It is the Best Answer
Stakeholder Analysis:
Stakeholder analysis is essential to identify which stakeholders are involved, their levels of influence
and involvement, and their primary concerns. This process allows the architecture team to group
stakeholders with common concerns and develop targeted viewpoints for each group.
TOGAF emphasizes stakeholder analysis in Phase A (Architecture Vision) to ensure that the
architecture addresses the specific needs of various stakeholder groups, especially in complex, multi-
stakeholder environments like the one described in the scenario.
Definition of Concerns and Viewpoints:
After identifying the stakeholders and their concerns, TOGAF recommends defining specific
viewpoints that reflect these concerns. This involves documenting these concerns and aligning them
with architectural objectives, ensuring each group’s needs are clearly addressed.
Recording these concerns and viewpoints in the Architecture Vision document provides a
consolidated, high-level reference that informs future phases and guides architecture work to
address stakeholder expectations and regulatory requirements effectively.
Alignment with TOGAF ADM and Stakeholder Management Guidelines:
TOGAF’s Chapter 24 (Stakeholder Management) and Section 24.2 outline the importance of
identifying, grouping, and managing stakeholders to ensure the architecture work meets their needs.
This is particularly crucial when stakeholders have distinct, potentially conflicting concerns, such as
compliance, legal standards, and local operational requirements.
Additionally, by recording this information in the Architecture Vision document (an outcome of Phase
A), the team provides a baseline for engaging stakeholders throughout the project, which is critical in
high-stakes, regulated environments.
Why Options A, B, and D Are Less Suitable
Option A: While creating a Communications Plan and using a stakeholder power grid matrix are
useful actions, they are insufficient for addressing specific stakeholder concerns and viewpoints. This
option lacks a structured approach to defining specific viewpoints based on stakeholder concerns,
which is a key TOGAF recommendation in managing complex requirements.
Option B: Developing an Organization Map and uniform models could help visualize relationships,
but this option misses the critical step of grouping stakeholders by their concerns and defining
viewpoints. TOGAF does not recommend a one-size-fits-all model in situations where different
groups have distinct needs.
Option D: Identifying stakeholders by category and developing models for each group can help, but
identifying 22 specific types of stakeholders and applying a rigid classification misses the nuance
required for a more tailored approach. TOGAF instead encourages developing viewpoints based on
stakeholder concerns and does not prescribe an exact count or rigid categories of stakeholders, as it
may not be suitable for all cases.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option C
TOGAF Chapter 24 (Stakeholder Management): Emphasizes the need for identifying and managing
stakeholders and their concerns, particularly through defining viewpoints and concerns relevant to
each group.
TOGAF Section 7.5.1: Recommends conducting a stakeholder analysis as part of the Architecture
Vision phase (Phase A), which includes defining the architecture’s scope, purpose, and high-level
requirements aligned with stakeholder needs.
TOGAF Section 7.5.2: Advises on capturing concerns and viewpoints in the Architecture Vision
document, which serves as a high-level guide to ensure all stakeholders' requirements are
understood and tracked throughout the project.
In conclusion, Option C is the best answer as it aligns with TOGAF’s approach to stakeholder analysis,
defining viewpoints based on stakeholder concerns, and documenting these in the Architecture
Vision document to address the needs of the Chief Compliance Officer, legal staff, auditors, and local
operating companies.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You have been assigned the role of Lead Enterprise Architect within a leading
professional services company that specializes in providing outsourcing services.
Outsourcing services include business processes, infrastructure, and service
management. The company also provides business consulting services.
The company has an established Enterprise Architecture program based on the TOGAF
standard, sponsored jointly by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer.
An Architecture Board has been formed comprised of IT staff executives and executives
from the major service areas and consulting practice.
With numerous service areas and many diverse engagements in progress at any given
time, overall engagement management within the company has become challenging.
The company has recently had a number of high profile projects that have overrun on
budget and under delivered, thereby damaging its reputation.
The Enterprise Architecture (EA) team has been working with the Strategic Planning
team to create a strategic Enterprise Architecture to address these issues. The EA team
has held workshops with key stakeholders to define a set of architecture principles to
govern the architecture work. They have completed an Architecture Vision at a strategic
level and laid out high-level Architecture Definitions for the four domains. They have set
out an ambitious vision of the future of the company over a five-year period. This will
include three distinct transformations.
The CIO has made it clear that prior to the approval of the detailed Implementation and
Migration plan, the EA team will need to assess the risks associated with the proposed
architecture. He has received concerns from some of the senior management across the
company that the proposed architecture may be too ambitious and they are not sure it
can produce sufficient value to warrant the risks.
Refer to the Scenario
You have been asked to recommend an approach to satisfy these concerns.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
B
Explanation:
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
In this scenario, the Lead Enterprise Architect must address concerns from senior management
regarding the risks of an ambitious five-year transformation strategy. Senior management is
uncertain if the architecture can deliver enough value to justify the risks. The CIO has requested an
assessment of these risks before approving the detailed Implementation and Migration Plan.
The TOGAF ADM (Architecture Development Method) provides guidance for risk and readiness
assessments as part of Phases E (Opportunities and Solutions) and F (Migration Planning).
Specifically, TOGAF encourages readiness assessments to evaluate an organization’s capability for
change and Business Value Assessments to gauge the potential value and risks associated with
proposed changes.
Explanation of Option B and Why It is the Best Answer
Readiness Assessment:
A Readiness Assessment helps in evaluating whether the organization is prepared to undertake the
transformations. This assessment will identify any gaps in the organization’s capabilities, culture, or
resources needed to support the change. Addressing these gaps helps mitigate the risks of
transformation.
TOGAF’s ADM Phase F includes readiness assessment as a critical activity, as it provides insights into
how prepared the organization is for the changes and identifies required improvement actions,
which can be integrated into the Implementation and Migration Plan.
Business Value Assessment:
TOGAF recommends using a Business Value Assessment Technique to determine the value and
associated risks of the transformation. This technique provides a structured approach to assess
whether the anticipated business benefits are likely to be realized and at what level of risk. It helps
ensure that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the expected outcomes, costs, and risks.
This assessment would address the senior management's concerns about whether the proposed
architecture changes would deliver sufficient value to justify the risks, which aligns with TOGAF’s
guidance in Phases E and F.
Aligns with TOGAF ADM Phases E and F:
In Phase E (Opportunities and Solutions), TOGAF specifies the identification of business
transformation risks and readiness for change as part of creating the Architecture Roadmap.
In Phase F (Migration Planning), these analyses help in finalizing the Implementation and Migration
Plan. By addressing risks early, the EA team can incorporate risk mitigation strategies and align the
plan with the organization’s readiness to adopt changes.
Why Options A, C, and D Are Less Suitable
Option A: Although gathering information from the Architecture Repository and performing a state
evolution analysis are useful steps, this option lacks a readiness assessment and a value assessment,
which are specifically relevant to evaluating the feasibility and value of ambitious transformations.
Without these assessments, senior management’s concerns regarding risks and value remain
insufficiently addressed.
Option C: Interoperability analysis primarily addresses integration between system components, not
the broader organizational readiness or the risk and value concerns raised by senior management.
While interoperability is important, it is a technical aspect that does not directly address readiness
for change or business value.
Option D: Consolidating gap analysis results is a relevant step for determining necessary changes, but
it does not specifically address the need to evaluate the organizational readiness or to assess the
business value and associated risks. This approach also omits the Business Value Assessment, which
is crucial for justifying the transformations.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option B
TOGAF Section 31.3.5: Recommends using Readiness Assessment to determine the capability of an
organization to support transformation efforts.
TOGAF Section 31.3.8: Describes the Business Value Assessment Technique as a way to assess the
potential value and risks of proposed transformations.
TOGAF ADM Phases E and F: Emphasize the importance of readiness assessments and risk analysis
for the creation of the Architecture Roadmap and Implementation and Migration Plan, ensuring that
plans align with the organization’s ability to adopt and benefit from the changes.
In summary, Option B is the best answer as it aligns with TOGAF's guidance on performing readiness
and value assessments to address management’s concerns regarding the risk and value of the
transformation.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect at an multinational company. The company
designs, manufactures and sells products worldwide. It has grown rapidly by
acquisition and has inherited numerous different business processes and related IT
systems. This has led in many instances to a duplication of resources.
The Chief Operating Officer (COO) has made the decision to consolidate and reduce
redundant business processes and IT systems in the sales operations. She has
committed to the CEO that the business will migrate to a set of standardized solutions
that will reduce costs and improve efficiency.
The Enterprise Architecture practice at the company has been assigned to manage
the project. At present, there are no architectural assets in the Architecture Repository
related to this initiative. All assets will need to be acquired, customized, or created
from scratch. The CIO, who is the project sponsor, has identified the need for a set of
commercial off the shelf package applications as candidates for the target. She has
also stated that she is not concerned about preserving the existing business
processes or IT systems within the sales operations.
Your team leader has asked you to assist with developing a response to the following
questions:
Which groups of users will use the different applications and IT systems?
How many licenses and type of licenses are needed for the packaged applications?
What level of support is needed for the users?
Where should the support center(s) be located?
What new capabilities will be required to support this business change?
How much will the migration cost?
This project is using an iterative approach for executing the TOGAF Architecture
Development Method. The architecture development project has completed the
Architecture Vision Phase. A set of packaged applications has been identified and is
being considered, the next iteration will include development of the Business and
Application Target Architectures.
Refer the Scenario.
[Note: You may need to refer to the Architectural Artifacts chapter, section 31.6
(located in Part IV) of the reference text in order to answer this question.]
You have been asked to identify the most appropriate catalogs, matrices, and
diagrams to support the Architecture development.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best
answer?
A. You would describe the Target Business Architecture with a Business
Interaction matrix, and a Business Service/Function catalog. You would
describe the Target Application Architecture with an Application Communication
diagram, an Application Interaction matrix and an Interface catalog.
B. You would describe the Target Business Architecture with an
Organization/Actor catalog, a Business Service/Function catalog, and a
Capability/Organization matrix. You would describe the Target Application
Architecture with an Application Portfolio catalog and an Application/Function
matrix.
C. You would describe the Target Business Architecture with a Business
Capability Map, a Location catalog, and an Organization/Actor catalog. You
would describe the Target Application Architecture with an
Application/Organization Matrix, and Application Migration diagram.
D. You would describe the Target Business Architecture with a Business
Service/Function catalog, a Location catalog, and an Organization/Actor
catalog. You would describe the Target Application Architecture with an
Application Migration diagram, and an Application and User Location diagram.
B
Analysis of Scenario and TOGAF Guidance
Given the scenario, the main objective is to create a consolidated and standardized architecture for
sales operations using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM). The COO aims to
reduce redundancy and enhance efficiency, while the CIO has specified a preference for off-the-shelf
applications rather than preserving the current, potentially redundant systems.
The ADM process is currently transitioning from the Architecture Vision phase to the Business and
Application Target Architectures in the next iteration. The identified areas of focus include defining
the Target Business and Application Architectures, which require specific catalogs, matrices, and
diagrams for effective representation.
Selection of Artifacts
According to TOGAF 9.2, artifacts like catalogs, matrices, and diagrams are essential in representing
different aspects of the architecture. These are detailed in Section 31.6 (Architectural Artifacts
chapter, Part IV) of the TOGAF Standard, which outlines the purpose of each artifact type within the
ADM phases.
Rationale for Option B
This catalog is used to capture all actors (people, organizations, etc.)
involved in the business operations. It is essential for mapping the current and target structure and
aligns with the goal of consolidating operations to reduce redundancy.
This catalog lists all the business services and functions, helping
identify which services/functions will remain, be removed, or be merged. This aligns with the
objective of standardizing and streamlining processes.
This matrix maps business capabilities to organizational units, which
helps define what new capabilities may be required to support the business change as requested by
the COO.
This catalog identifies and details applications involved in the target
architecture, including the new off-the-shelf package applications. It is crucial for cataloging all
software solutions that will be part of the consolidated system.
This matrix links applications to the business functions they support,
which is instrumental in assessing how the new applications align with the business needs.
Alignment with TOGAF ADM Guidelines
Catalogs like the Organization/Actor catalog and Business
Service/Function catalog are appropriate to capture actors and their interactions with services.
Additionally, matrices like the Capability/Organization matrix align with TOGAF guidelines to
document necessary business capabilities and organizational responsibilities.
For the Application Architecture, an Application Portfolio
catalog supports cataloging applications as the organization considers packaged solutions. The
Application/Function matrix is useful for mapping how these applications fulfill specific business
functions, aligning with TOGAF guidance for this phase.
Why Options A, C, and D are Less Suitable
While it includes the Business Service/Function catalog, it does not provide sufficient
emphasis on organizational structure or capabilities (e.g., Capability/Organization matrix), both of
which are crucial for understanding the roles and responsibilities in the target business structure.
This option suggests a Business Capability Map and Application/Organization matrix, which
are less directly relevant to the immediate needs of cataloging applications and mapping functions to
applications as specified by the CIO’s intent to move to standardized packages.
The Application Migration diagram and Application and User Location diagram are more
appropriate for later stages of the architecture, focusing on implementation rather than the Business
and Application Architectures, making them premature for this stage.
TOGAF Reference Supporting Option B
Organization/Actor
catalog, Business Service/Function catalog, and Application Portfolio catalog are standard catalogs
for Business and Application Architectures.
Capability/Organization matrix and Application/Function matrix are recommended matrices for
defining relationships between capabilities, organizations, and functions.
Thus, Option B is the most suitable answer as it aligns with the requirements in the scenario and
adheres to TOGAF’s recommended artifacts for the Business and Application Architectures in these
ADM phases.